113
Here is the Analysis how Lazarevic could Have Won the Game Against Gaprindashvili:
Move 19:
– Lazarevic played 19. Qb3.
– Instead, 19. Be3 could have been played to increase the pressure on the black bishop on c5 and maintain control over important squares.

Move 23:
– Lazarevic played 23. Rac1.
– Alternative: 23. Rdc1 to maintain control over the c-file and increase the pressure on the black queen.

Move 25:
– Lazarevic played 25. Qxb5.
– Alternative: 25. Rb1 to block the b-pawn and take control over the b-file.

Move 29:
– Lazarevic played 29. Qa3.
– Alternative: 29. Qa8 to exert pressure on the black king and create tactical opportunities.

Move 30:
– Lazarevic played 30. Re1.
– Alternative: 30. Qd6 to keep the queen active and target weaknesses in the black position.

By choosing these alternative moves, Lazarevic could have improved her position and maintained control over the game, potentially leading to a victory.

Special Aspects of the Game Between Lazarevic and Gaprindashvili in 1961 in Vrnjacka Banja

– This game was part of the Women’s World Championship in 1961 in Vrnjacka Banja, a significant tournament in the chess calendar.
– Nona Gaprindashvili and Milunka Lazarevic were outstanding chess players of their time. Gaprindashvili later became the fifth Women’s World Chess Champion.
– The game was marked by dynamic play and tactical sharpness, with both players navigating complex and challenging positions.
– The endgame is particularly instructive and is often studied for its tactical subtleties and strategic decisions.
– The move 25…Qe3!! by Gaprindashvili is considered particularly strong and is an example of her tactical brilliance.
– This game remains a remarkable example of high-level chess play and the skills of two outstanding chess players.